This study compares human and domestic pig decomposition using multivariate methods.
This dissertation directly compares decomposition patterns along morphological indicators, insect activity, and scavenging to assess if decomposition between humans and domestic pigs is similar enough such that data produced from a pig model can accurately predict human patterns. The results of this study suggest that in terms of decomposition as an entire complex process, patterns differ between domestic pigs and humans. Individual similarities in specific variables do exist, but the overall patterns differ between species to an extent that pigs cannot substitute for humans in all taphonomic and decomposition research, especially where the goal is to improve estimations of the postmortem interval. This study examines 15 human donors to 15 domestic pigs across three seasons. The data are analyzed with multivariate methods, including hierarchical linear modeling and dynamic linear regression time series analysis. Animal proxies are frequently used to substitute for human remains in decomposition studies. Domestic pigs have become the most commonly used nonhuman proxy due to an assumed similarity in decomposition progression
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Improving Sexual Assault Kit Outcomes
- Introducing "DoPP": A Graphical User-Friendly Application for the Rapid Species Identification of Psychoactive Plant Materials and Quantification of Psychoactive Small Molecules Using DART-MS Data
- DNA-Based Identification of Forensically Important Lucilia (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the Continental United States